DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
01 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
HD
Docket No. NRB699-14
4 AD to AUS
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
TO: Secretary of the Navy
Subl: = ee lea ae
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: ta) LO Us... 1552
Encl: 1) DD Form 149 dtd 16 dul 14 w/attachments
ta 29 Jan 15
(1)
(2) HOMC MMPR memo dtd
(3) HOMC MMRP-50 memo atd 25 Mar 15
, and pursuant
tion indicat
evidence A \ I
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, anda
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.
(2), MMPR, the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC)
Promotion Branch, has advised that if Petitioner had been promoted
pursuant to selection by the FY 2014 Major selection Board, he would
have been assigned a date of rank and effective date at
1 February 2014.
@. In enclosure
(3), MMRP-50, the HOMC Counseling and
has commented to the effect that Petitioner's
his promotion has merit an
da. In enclosure
Evaluation Section,
request to backdate
action.
a warrants favorable
CONCLUSION:
evidence of record, and
consideration of all the
and (3), the
Upon review and
he contents of enclosures (2)
especially in light of t
Board finds an injustice
RECOMMENDATION :
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where
f rank and effective date in the grade
vice 1 May 2014; and that his lineal
a.
appropriate, tos
of major as 1 February 2014,
precedence be adjusted accordingly.
i reat =? ae =F - + - + a - 4 }
b. That any mMateric- or entries inconsistent 1 OL
he corrected, removed or completely
vecord and that ne such
im the rucure.
ertified that a quorum was present at the Board’s review
4. Itisc
and that the foregoing is at
and deliberations,
complete record of the
MAEECE ;
—
JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder
—— eS eVW7wY_O
———E .
0
5. The foregoing report of the Board is submitted for your review
and action.
ROBHRT JU. U' NEL
Reviewed and approved:
Dist Reed 4/2
ROBERT L. WOODS
Assistant General Counsel
(Manpower and Reserve Affairs)
1000 Navy Pentagon, Rm 4D548
Washington, DC 20350-1000
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3482 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of major he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Major Selection Board, vice the FY 2014 Major Selection Board. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8165 13
In this regard, the majority is not persuaded that Petitioner's selection by the FY 2014 promotion board, witha corrected fitness report record, would have been definitely unlikely. The majority notes that Petitioner’s failure of selection by the FY 2015 promotion board, for which he had a corrected fitness report record, must 2 be removed to restore him to the status he had for the FY 2014 board, as an officer who had not failed of selection. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected so...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5915 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015S. In enclosure (3}, the HOMC Counseling and Evaluation Section has commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request to remove his failure of selection to major has merit and warrants favorable action. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (3), the Board finds an injustice warranting the following corrective action: RECOMMENDATION: a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7883 14
Pursuant to the provisions Of n, hereinaiter yeferred to as Delite osure (1) wich cable naval + for Zi 2, The Board, csonsisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Ivins and Spein, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 October 2014, and pursuant to ats regulations, determined that should be taken on the the corrective action indicated below terial considered available evidence of record.. having reviewed all the facts of record 3, The Board, pertaining to petitioner's allegations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01582-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No: 1582-11 10 March 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tes Secretary of the Navy ij REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: fa) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11866 14
c. The page 11 entry at issue counsels Petitioner for “Violation of the UCMJ [Uniform Code of Military Justice] Article 92 by involving yourself in an inappropriate relationship with the spouse of another service member.” d. Enclosure (3) shows that the PERB basis for removing the contested fitness report included a finding that the page 11 entry in question, which was cited in the fitness report, “was not substantiated.” e. In the advisory opinion at enclosure (4), the HOMC office with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09077-07
By letter dated 7 June 2005, the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) recommended to the Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) that Petitioner’s name be withheld from the FY 2006 Colonel Promotion List. This advisory stated he was withheld from the FY 2006 promotion list because of the adverse fitness report (which had not yet been removed), and that without the report, his record is “obviously competitive.” Petitioner was not considered by the FY 2007 Colonel Selection Board. p. Enclosure (15)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5679 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing his failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Major Selection Board and granting him consideration by a special selection board (SSB) for the FY 2014 Major Selection Board. “Consequently, the logical implication was that the petitioner was passed over for promotion every year...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5246 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. The third sighting officer verified that Petitioner “did not complete a PFT IAW [in accordance with} the Physical Fitness Program.” d. In support of his application, Petitioner submitted a statement dated 12 December 2013 from the RO, recommending “in the strongest terms” that the contested fitness report be removed. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the following fitness report and related...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00191-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 October 2009 to 15 May 2010, a copy of which is at Tab A. This request was not considered, as Petitioner may submit a request for a special selection board directly to the Secretary of the Navy, via HQMC {(MMPR-1), on the basis of the corrective actions in...